SECTION 22. IC 35-48-1-19, AS AMENDED BY P.L.165-2014, SECTION 3, IS AMENDED TO READ AS FOLLOWS [EFFECTIVE UPON PASSAGE]: Sec. 19. (a) “Marijuana” means any part of the plant genus Cannabis whether growing or not; the seeds thereof; the resin extracted from any part of the plant, including hashish and hash oil; any compound, manufacture, salt, derivative, mixture, or preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin.”
HOW THE STING WORKS:
“Marijuana” doesn’t CONTAIN THC. PERIOD.
SO WHAT IF: “Marijuana” means “Four Wheels and A Pull Handle?”
Wouldn’t THAT MAKE a Radio Flyer: “Schedule of Controlled Substances I”?
“Marijuana” CANNOT produce, NOR synthesize THC.
Why would there BE ANY ALARM WHEN THERE IS NO THC?
Someone is not telling the truth. More Legal Lies.
“Marijuana” DOES NOT MEAN “any part of the plant genus Cannabis whether growing or not;”
Cannabis DOES NOT PRODUCE “Marijuana”.
“Marijuana” are the INTENTIONAL DRIED FLOWERS of the plant genus Cannabis TO BE USED as a RECREATIONAL NARCOTIC. This isn’t Harry Potter where the Plant magically intends to be used ONLY as politician attempt to DEFINE.
NO. The plant CANNOT PRODUCE THC. PERIOD.
STOP MAKING THC DURING TESTING.
STOP REQUIRING THC.
STOP TAMPERING EVIDENCE TO “DRY-WEIGHT”.
They JUST DEFINE “DRY-WEIGHT” to REQUIRE a CHEMICAL ADDITIVE that CHANGES THE WHOLE CHEMICAL STRUCTURE OF THE PLANT.
EVEN THEN…THERE IS NO THC.
TAMPERING THE EVIDENCE a SECOND TIME.
SORRY…Legalizing CBD…DOES NOT ERASE THE MARIJUANA FRAUD.
Intentional, LIKE IT TAKES 12 WEEKS TO DRY!
What an F-ing JOKE!
Calling “Cannabis” by the name “marijuana” is like calling grape jelly…”Wine in 12 weeks”.
I bet $100 if you dry lettuce for 12 weeks you will NEVER associate the waste product you have in 12 weeks with Lettuce.
Same goes for Cannabis. 12 Week Old Cannabis is long since edible.
NOT “resin extracted”.
NOT “any compound”.
NOT “any…preparation of the plant, its seeds or resin”.
NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO, NO!
“Marijuana” IS NOT the:
WHEN THE PEOPLE KEEP ASKING TO GROW CANNABIS FOR FOOD.
We get kindergarten Science to INSIST on these “0.3% THC by DRY WEIGHT” CLAUSES…
It SPELLS OUT the FRAUD.
FOR A PLANT THAT CANNOT PRODUCE THC.
So the FRAUD CONTINUES.